Naveen Kumar Singh
Naveen is a professional agile coach and has been working independently for a long time in the Asia... Read more
Naveen is a professional agile coach and has been working independently for a long time in the Asia... Read more
Estimation in Agile Software Development is one of the most discussed and debated topics, but still, it confuses many people. We always wanted to know more and more about estimation and planning. A group of people was asking the below question during my recent talk then someone requested an answer on Quora as well. So I thought, why not write a detailed explanation here?
5 most frequently asked questions related to estimation.
We wanted to know how much time would take to get the required software and how much money someone has to pay for it. So is there a way to answer this question while practicing Scrum? Because Scrum is for developing complex software.
Why is software development complex? Because the requirement is either not consistent, technologies keep changing, or both. If something is complex, then estimating duration and cost will not be easy, but our sponsor wants an estimate.
Estimate means approximation, so there can’t be an accurate estimate because the accurate estimate is an oxymoron either estimate or accurate. Estimates help in planning releases, funding development efforts, and mitigating risks.
Join our Product Owner PSPO Training for top-notch instruction from Naveen and Sumeet. With a 100% success track record, your training success is assured.
Book Your Seat!Any method is acceptable as long as everyone understands that this is just an estimate and not a contract. You may use a user story point, functional point, use case point, complexity point, number of days or hours, etc. But we are talking about complex software given by a team, not by an individual, so better to use acceptable techniques for everyone.
At the early stage of my software engineering career, my manager introduced complexity-based estimation, and it was useful. We were using five scales — very low, low, medium, high, and very high.
Very low means approx one day, low means 1–3 days, medium means 3–5 days, high means 4–8 days, and very high means 7–12 days. Later we changed it to a T-shirt size, but it was similar. When we used story points, it became confusing because points were also numbered. Many tried to convert points directly to days rather than using it as a scale. Although story points are more popular nowadays and you can try the same be careful.
If we know how much time it will take to solve the problem, then no harm in estimating in days or hours. But we are talking about the complex domain and team to estimate, so it will be difficult to estimate in days and hours.
Difficult but possible if everyone understands the purpose of the estimate. If the objective is to forecast releases, have some initial budget allocation, and track progress toward releases, then no harm in estimating ideal days.
If the aim is to hold an individual, team, or organization accountable for the same, it defeats the estimate’s purpose, and then it turns out to be a contract game. In such cases, people use psychology rather than mathematics to see what number will win the contract. Story points or any relative estimate help in avoiding the contract game.
Relative estimates are about sizing problems based on some factors like the bigness of the problem, requirement clarity technology complexity, etc. Since the team prefers writing PBI (Product Backlog Item) in the User Story, so story point becomes the perfect choice. You can even think about the complexity point or use case point if you are using another format for writing PBIs.
If there is already an estimated PBI, we estimate the rest compared to that, but what if we don’t have any existing estimated PBI? We have to pick one PBI with moderate complexity (for example — everyone agreed that a PBI is an intermediate complex because there are 3–4 validations and 2–3 workflows, the requirement is well understood, and the technology is not new).
Since we have one now, 2nd PBI can be estimated compared with 1st PBI. Similarly, 3rd PBIs can be estimated compared with 1st and 2nd PBIs. We can use the Fibonacci series to estimate and define scale: -
1 — Very Small, 2 — Small, 3 — Medium, 5 — Large, 8 — Very Large, 13 — Very Very Large
The team can use planning games to estimate. Planning Poker and Estimation Walls are popular techniques among agile teams. I will write about both in my next blog. Estimates given in points do not answer our initial questions. How soon the product be completed, and how much will it cost?
Our sponsor/customer/business wanted to know when they will get the full product even before the team starts working on 1st PBI, so what to do?
Try to understand the purpose of the same before providing any number. Usually, it is for awarding a contract to the vendor or securing the initial budget.
Awarding a contract based on only a financial quote is not advisable, and many companies don’t follow it anymore. However, financial quotes are still needed to formulate an initial contract.
Some companies follow analogous estimates, few follow PERT estimation, and many follow capacity-based estimations.
Analogous estimation: It is based on historical data. We look at the total points that the team has identified compare them with past projects and quote some numbers. It also depends on who owns the risks due to requirement changes.
Discover the importance of Team and Technical Agility in scaling Agile practices. Learn how to foster adaptability, collaboration, quality, and innovation across your organization to deliver value to customers faster, more reliably, and with higher quality.
Start now!The Scrum team can estimate either during product backlog refinement or during sprint planning events. I personally prefer estimating during product backlog refinement. Some companies also follow the release planning technique, but technically it is a product backlog retirement that happens before the first sprint.
I teach in my Professional Scrum Master and Professional Scrum Product Owner classes. You can join our upcoming mentoring sessions too. I would suggest exploring the Agilemania website.
Naveen is a professional agile coach and has been working independently for a long time in the Asia Pacific. He works with the software development team and product team to develop awesome products based on empirical processes.
WhatsApp UsSumeet is an excellent coach and can relate the subject to the day-to-day work we do. That makes our understanding easie...
I attended PSPO Training by Sumeet Madan last wakened and I must say it has been the best training ever. He did not open...
I had recently attended PSPO training with Sumeet Madan and it was fantastic! His expertise in Agile product ownership i...
Excellent way of providing the training by Preeth. Scenario based teaching approach makes it extremely easy to learn and...
I recently took the ICP-ENT (Enterprise Agile Coaching) training with an online course. The customer service was great a...
We will get back to you soon!
For a detailed enquiry, please write to us at devops@agilemania.com
We will get back to you soon!
For a detailed enquiry, please write to us at devops@agilemania.com